Sunday, March 8, 2009

Here in bottom of this article, is a list of Indian Prime Ministers.

Here in bottom of this article, is a list of Indian Prime Ministers.

Slowly and slowly Rahul is eing groomed for PM. There is news that Rahul now ready to be General Secretary of Congress.



There may be Bollywood-Hollywood, Bureaucrat or even leadership dynasty clone.

We may discuss for this and for human cone. There should not be only one qualification to be Nehru-Gandhi dynasty clone for Prime Minister Post to run India. There may be dictators and there may be king and queens in a corner of the world. But we don’t want to return in that era. Because of Nehru Gandhi dynasty, Rahul baba may be like a Prince Charles. It is unfortunate that he should be groomed for PM post. Have we learnt from ‘Dronacharya’ of Mahabharat. Did he give his son Aswasthama better chance than Arjun or others? This is right that there should not be castism. ‘Karn’ and ‘Arjun’ should be treated equally.



Nehru sired the most powerful political dynasty in India's modern history. His daughter Indira Gandhi would become Prime Minister within two years of his death in 1966, and would serve for 15 years and 3 terms. His grandson Rajiv Gandhi would hold that office from 1984 to 1989.



Today, Rajiv's widow Sonia Gandhi is Congress President, but is not Prime Minister despite the Congress efforts. Sonia is grooming her son Rahul Gandhi for the future, possibly as the next Indian Prime Minister. Rahul Gandhi's political grooming has started when he kicked up his job in the UK to join his mother on the campaign trail.



Sonia announced at a press conference in Mumbai, that it is the right of the people of India to say who shall be prime minister. But every citizen has also right to know, is this also a right to exploit open hearted Indian voters in the name of Nehru-Gandhi dynasty to ruin the Indian tradition, Indian civilization which is Hinduism based as explained by Supreme Court and also boldly written by Mark Tully?



There has been a shadow over the Congress procedure of anointing a prime minister ever since Jawaharlal Nehru's day. If we go back to the year 1946: The choice of Congress president became crucial since it was certain that the Viceroy would invite him or her to head the interim government. Twelve of the 15 Pradesh Congress Committees proposed the name of Sardar Patel; not one of them sent up the name of Jawaharlal Nehru -- not even his native United Provinces (as Uttar Pradesh was then titled). It was at this point that Mahatma Gandhi made his last decisive intervention in the affairs of the nation. The fact remains that Sardar Patel, the choice of the people, failed to become prime minister through a palace coup. Why there was partiality with Subhas Chandra Bose and Phiroze Khan (Gandhi)?



Mahatma Gandhi was late to realize his blunder mistake to name Nehru as PM. Following independence, the Mahatma wanted the Congress to be dissolved But selfish and opportunist could not fulfill his last wish also. Vallabhbhai Patel managed Congress, controlling the party machine better than anyone else before or after him. Vallabhbhai died in 1950 and after that the Congress largely became a party led by the Nehru family. Congress of prior independence days was the property of all Indians jointly. Today’s Congress has no right to exploit that.



Indira was Nehru's daughter and groomed by her affectionate father as his
visible heir without anyone even considerate to notice the political grooming.

Kamaraj declared that he had made a personal promise to Nehru, to make Indira, the Prime Minister 'at any cost'. Nehru had assisted Kamaraj earlier in his political ambitions and had made him the General Secretary of the Congress Party.



The Congress continued to defy the popular will long after Independence. It set up Charan Singh in 1979 and Chandra Shekhar in 1990 though both men lacked legitimacy. H D Deve Gowda or I K Gujral were also not the Indian people choice as prime minister when the Congress (I) propped them up!



Congress has a poor tradition when it comes to choosing leaders. UPA tries to fool us; can the 'secular' alliance UPA which is now headless, went to the people under the leadership of a single leader? If not, talk of leaving the choice to the people is just another stone in the grand edifice of untruth erected by the Congress. Gandhi resigned but UPA’s main ally CPM and Somnath Chaterrjee did not follow her.



JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU (Tenure1947-1964)

GULZARI LAL NANDA (MAY - JUNE, 1964 'acting' & 11-24, JANUARY,1966 'acting')
LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI (1964-1966)

INDIRA GANDHI (1966-1977 & 1980-1984))

MORARJI DESAI (1977-1979)

CHARAN SINGH (1979-1980

RAJIV GANDHI (1984-1989)

CHANDRASHEKHAR (1990-1991)
P.V.NARASIMHARAO (1991-1996)

A.B.VAJPAYEE ( 19.3.1998 - 13-10-1999, 13-10-1999- 22-5-2004 )

H.D.DEVEGOWDA (1.6.1996 - 21.4.1997)
I. K.GUJARAL (21.4.1997 - 18.3.1998)

Dr. MANMOHAN SINGH (May 22, 2004 - till date)

No comments:

Post a Comment